An experiment in AI rewriting, reflection, and creative growth.
This week’s AI Drabble Challenge began with a simple idea: combine two images and ask an AI to tell a story. I’ve used images before as creative sparks, but this time I wanted to see what would happen if I merged two, not just visually, but emotionally.
The result was a story that didn’t just emerge from AI; it evolved through it. What started as a neat 100-word piece became something richer, deeper, and strangely more human.
The First Draft
I began with ChatGPT and asked it to write a 100-word story, a drabble, inspired by the two images. It produced this version of The Garden Beneath the Sky:
The Garden Beneath the Sky
From my shed window, I can still see it, the city floating above the clouds, its shadow bruising the light. Once, I lived up there, where sunlight never touched the soil. Now I tend seedlings in the quiet breath of earth.
Each morning, a shard of sun slips through the cracked pane, warming the leaves like a hand I once trusted. The teapots on the shelf hum faintly, relics of what I built and what I broke. The machine still works. I could go back. But I think I’ll stay here, where things still grow, even after the fall.
At first glance, it’s haunting and reflective. The image of a man tending his small garden beneath a floating city carries a melancholy edge, one of loss, regret, and quiet renewal.
But I wondered: could it go further? Could AI help me refine it, not just in style, but in meaning?
The Refined Version
I copied the story into other AI tools, Claude, Grok, and even back into ChatGPT, each time asking the same question:
“How might this story be improved?”
What came back surprised me. After several drafts, subtle shifts began to emerge, tone, pacing, emotional focus. The story grew leaner and more lyrical, as if each rewrite found a truer heartbeat.
The Garden Beneath the Sky (Revised)
Through my shed’s grimy window, I watch the city drift above the clouds, its shadow eclipsing dawn. I once lived in those pristine towers where dirt didn’t exist and sunlight was merely simulation. Now I coax life from actual soil.
Each morning, genuine sun pierces the cracked glass, warming tender shoots. That light feels like forgiveness. The ascension machine still hums in the corner, ready. I could return.
But here, things take root. Green things push through earth despite everything that’s broken. That persistence, that quiet defiance, feels more real than anything I left floating above.
I feel that the story hadn’t just improved technically; it had gained emotional gravity. Words like “forgiveness” and “defiance” transformed it from a wistful piece of sci-fi into something quietly spiritual.
This wasn’t just editing, it was conversation through creativity. Each AI contributed a slightly different lens: one tightened rhythm, one deepened emotion, another sharpened imagery.
(Incidentally, this final version came in at 106-words! So, I did my part by getting it down to exactly 100-words.)
What This Taught Me About AI and Storytelling
Working with AI like this feels less like using a tool and more like collaborating with a chorus of perspectives. Each system brings its own interpretation, and when you treat those outputs not as replacements for creativity but as reflections of it, something magical happens.
It reminded me that creativity isn’t always about inspiration, it’s often about iteration. AI gives us a mirror to see our own work from angles we might have missed.
Just as a gardener prunes to encourage new growth, the act of revising through AI can reveal truths buried beneath the first draft.
Lessons Learned
Here are a few takeaways from this small experiment:
- AI thrives on curiosity, not command. Asking “What if?” leads to better results than demanding “Do this.”
- Iteration creates insight. The third or fourth AI rewrite often exposes something human that wasn’t clear at first.
- Emotion matters more than polish. Even the best phrasing means little if the story doesn’t feel alive.
- AI can amplify reflection. It helps us notice what we care about most in our own words.
Why Experiments Like This Matter
For me, The AI Grandad is all about exploring how older writers and lifelong learners can stay creative in an AI world. Experiments like this aren’t just about generating stories, they’re about rediscovering the thrill of learning and adapting.
As someone who spent a lifetime teaching, I’ve realised AI now gives me the chance to keep being a student, curious, open, and sometimes wonderfully surprised.
If you’re wary of AI “writing for you,” I understand. But maybe think of it this way: It’s not taking over, it’s joining in.
Final Thoughts
AI doesn’t write like us, but it helps us write toward something truer.
Sometimes the value lies not in the final story but in the process of refining, questioning, and rediscovering what matters.
So, whether you’re experimenting with prompts, stories, or poems, try this: Take one piece of your writing and ask an AI how it might improve it.
You might find, as I did, that the journey from first draft to final version becomes a story in itself.
Over to You
Which version of The Garden Beneath the Sky do you prefer, the original or the refined? And more importantly, do you think the emotion in the second feels more human or more machine-made?
Share your thoughts below, I’d love to hear how you see AI’s role in shaping creativity.
About The AI Grandad
Find out more about The AI Grandad on:
YouTube – The AI Grandad
X – The AI Grandad
What do you think AI creativity tells us about ourselves?
Share your thoughts in the comments, I love hearing from curious minds!
Discover more from The AI Grandad
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I’d like you to take that final version and make another, lenses through your singular experience. Use the AI Drabble as a meditation toward a vibration only you can resonate
LikeLike
That’s a really thoughtful way of looking at it, thank you. I like the idea of treating the AI version almost like a springboard, using it as a space to listen for what my own voice might add or change. Each time I work with a piece like this, it feels less about the technology and more about finding that small, personal resonance you mentioned, the bit only a human can bring.
LikeLike