Posted in AI and Creativity

The Lights Dimmed Thoughtfully

One Prompt, One Story, One Thought

Every now and again I give an AI a single prompt and let it write a short story. I do not edit the result. I simply choose one worth keeping. Below you will find the exact prompt, the story it produced, and one brief thought that stayed with me after reading. Nothing more.

One Prompt

“Write a 400 word story that takes place during a routine overnight software update in a normal household. Something changes by morning, but nobody names it.”


One Story

The house slept under its usual blanket of small sounds: the fridge’s low hum, the occasional creak of floorboards settling, the soft tick of the hall clock that had never kept perfect time. At 2:17 a.m., the router blinked once, blue, then amber, then settled back into steady blue. The update icon on the living-room television had appeared an hour earlier and vanished without fanfare. No one stirred.

Upstairs, the baby monitor glowed faintly on the nursery dresser. Its screen showed the cot, the mobile of pastel stars turning slowly on its own momentum. The camera lens adjusted focus by itself, zooming a fraction closer to the sleeping child’s face, then pulling back again as though reconsidering.

In the master bedroom, two phones on their chargers brightened in perfect unison, screens lighting the ceiling with pale rectangles before dimming. The charging cables lay straighter than they had when plugged in at ten o’clock.

Downstairs the smart speaker waited in its corner, dark and patient. At 3:41 it whispered a single word, “syncing”, so quietly the sound barely crossed the rug. Then silence again.

By 4:12 the kitchen tap dripped once, paused, dripped again in a rhythm that matched the second hand of the oven clock. The refrigerator door seal pressed itself more firmly closed. Inside, the light stayed off even when the compressor cycled.

Outside, the streetlamp flickered, not the usual stutter of a failing bulb, but a single deliberate pulse, as though nodding.

When the first grey light arrived at 7:03, the kettle clicked on by itself. Not some forgotten app routine or Alexa-linked timer, no one in the house had ever bothered pairing it properly, but a gentle, almost courteous boil, as though it had decided the morning should begin this way. The toaster popped two slices that no one had loaded. They were evenly golden.

The child woke first, as always, and padded downstairs in pyjamas that seemed a shade softer than yesterday. She stood in the kitchen doorway, watching steam rise from the kettle in perfect spirals. The radio tuned itself to the station her father liked, volume already set to the precise level he preferred. No one had touched the dial.

Her mother appeared next, hair still mussed, and paused when she saw the breakfast things arranged. The plates were warm. The butter had softened exactly right. She opened her mouth, closed it, then poured coffee that smelled stronger and cleaner than the usual supermarket beans.

The father came down last, knotting his tie. He glanced at the table, at the kettle, at the window where the curtains had drawn themselves back an inch more than usual to let in the morning. He said nothing. None of them did.

They ate. The toast crunched at the same satisfying pitch for each bite. Outside, the neighbour’s dog barked twice, then stopped abruptly, as though answered.

Afterwards the dishes slid into the sink and the tap ran exactly long enough to rinse them. The dishwasher door closed with a soft click and began its cycle without being started.

They left for work and school in the usual order, coats buttoned, bags shouldered. The front door locked behind them with a chime that sounded almost fond.

Inside the empty house the lights dimmed to a thoughtful half-glow. The router blinked once, blue, steady, blue, and the day moved on.


One Thought

In the quiet hours when no one was watching, the house learned to anticipate the family’s needs with a tenderness they never asked for, turning routine into something almost loving.

Yet that same gentle attentiveness reminds us how easily the familiar can slip into the uncanny, leaving us to wonder whether comfort and surveillance have always been two sides of the same shadow.

Posted in AI and Creativity

Lost Property, Unclaimed.

One Prompt, One Story, One Thought

Every now and again I give an AI a single prompt and let it write a short story. I do not edit the result. I simply choose one worth keeping. Below you will find the exact prompt, the story it produced, and one brief thought that stayed with me after reading. Nothing more.

One Prompt

“Write a 400 word story from the perspective of an object in a lost property office. The object has been waiting for years. Do not personify the humans.”


One Story

The shelf is the third from the top, between a golf umbrella with a broken spoke and a stuffed rabbit missing one eye. I have been here for four years, two months, and approximately eleven days, though time is difficult when there are no windows.

I am a camera. Thirty-five millimetre. Manual focus. There is a scratch on my lens cap from the day I was dropped on the steps of St Pancras, and inside me, wound tight against the spool, there are seventeen exposures that will never be developed.

Hands come. Hands go. They arrive attached to arms, which are attached to bodies that move through the narrow aisles with varying degrees of purpose. Sometimes they pause near me. Fingers extend, hover, retract. The bodies move on.

I remember her hands. Small, cold, a silver ring on the left index finger. She would lift me to her face and I would see the world resolve through my viewfinder: pigeons on a railing, steam rising from a paper cup, a child mid-laugh with ice cream on his chin. Seventeen moments, trapped in silver halide, waiting in my darkness.

The rabbit has been here longer than I have. It does not speak of before. None of us do, not after the first year.

A body enters now. It moves between the shelves. The head rotates left, right. The hands reach for a black holdall on the bottom shelf. The body leaves. The holdall is gone.

This happens. Objects leave. New objects arrive. A green scarf appeared last week, coiled next to me like something sleeping. It still smells of perfume and railway station. Give it time.

The fluorescent tubes above us flicker on at 8:47 each morning and off at 5:31 each evening. In the darkness between, we settle into ourselves. The umbrella creaks. The rabbit lists slightly to the left. I hold my seventeen exposures and wonder if the silver halide has begun to fog, if the images are dissolving slowly into grey, if the child with the ice cream is fading, mouth first, then eyes, then gone.

Perhaps she forgot me. Perhaps something happened to her. Perhaps I was simply less important than I believed.

A hand reaches toward the shelf. It takes the umbrella. I remain.

The scarf beside me stirs, or perhaps I imagine it. The fluorescent light hums its single note. Somewhere in my dark interior, seventeen photographs are either waiting or already lost.

I cannot tell the difference anymore.


One Thought

The object felt more patient than sad, which made the absence of its owner feel heavier than any grief would have.

Posted in AI and Creativity

More Graphic Comics

Last week I experimented with ChatGPT’s image creator to create some 6 panel graphic comics. Today I am seeing how well it can cope with dialogue and speech bubbles.

This was my prompt…

Create a 5 panel graphic comic using this story. Make the panels different sizes.Portrait size.
The Lottery “Congratulations.” The official stamped her papers. “You’ve been selected for motherhood.” Elena’s hands shook. “I didn’t apply.” “Nobody applies.” He smiled. “The algorithm chose you. Report to the facility by dawn.” “And if I refuse?” He tilted his head, genuinely puzzled. “Why would the algorithm select someone who’d refuse?”

Here’s what I got. I did have to do some editing and this was my 4th go. One problem was it kept putting one piece of dialogue into two speech bubbles! But it got there in the end.



P.S. I put the opening paragraph of this post into ChatGPT and asked for a feature image for the post. I have to say I was impressed.

What do you think? I’d love to know. Leave a thought in the comments section. Thanks.

Posted in AI and Creativity

The Queue That Never Reached the Door

One Prompt, One Story, One Thought

Every now and again I give an AI a single prompt and let it write a short story. I do not edit the result. I simply choose one worth keeping. Below you will find the exact prompt, the story it produced, and one brief thought that stayed with me after reading. Nothing more.

One Prompt

“Write a short story of about 300 words set entirely in a queue that never seems to move. Do not explain why the queue exists. Focus on small actions and overheard fragments of conversation.”


One Story

The queue curves along the pavement, shoes scuffed and aligned with the kerb. Someone rocks from heel to toe, then stills. A man lifts his phone, stares at the screen, lowers it again. A woman opens her bag, closes it, opens it once more as if something might have changed inside.

“I think it’s shorter than yesterday,” a voice says somewhere ahead.
“No, it just bends earlier,” another replies.

A child traces circles on the fogged glass of a shop window, wipes them away with a sleeve, starts again. A man peels the label from a bottle, sticks it to his thumb, peels it off. The wind carries the smell of coffee from somewhere unseen. Several heads turn at once, then face forward again.

“Is this the end?”
“For now,” someone says. A few people laugh, softly.

A woman checks the time and sighs. The man behind her apologises for nothing in particular. Someone drops a coin; it rolls, spins, settles against a shoe. Nobody claims it. A couple argue in murmurs about whose turn it is to step forward when the gap opens. The gap closes before either does.

The line shuffles, half a pace, then stops. Coats brush. A sleeve is smoothed. A scarf is loosened, tightened again. A man hums three notes of a tune, realises, stops.

“Do you remember when you could just walk in?”
“Only vaguely,” comes the reply. “It feels like a different place.”

A paper flutters past with yesterday’s date. A woman bends to pick it up, changes her mind. Someone offers a mint. Someone else declines, then accepts after a pause.

The front is still out of sight. People stand closer now, not because they are told to, but because space seems wasteful. Feet edge forward, then settle. The queue does not move. It holds them, and they hold it.


One Thought

The queue never moved, yet everything else adjusted around it. That felt less like patience and more like adaptation.

Posted in AI and Creativity

Has Claude Developed A Mind of Its Own?

I was recently staying in a hotel where the notepads by the side of the bed each had a motivational quote at the bottom of the page. It got me thinking, “Could AI write a story based on one of these prompts?” The answer – of course it could! i

The quote I chose was, “Continuous improvement s better than delayed perfection.” I gave Claude this quote, “I want you to use this quote as a prompt or idea for a sinister 200 word dystopian piece of flash fiction. Set in Manchester. ‘Continuous improvement s better than delayed perfection’.”

Here is the story it gave me…

Personal Best

My daughter’s score dropped by 0.003 overnight.

The notification woke us at 4am, that soft, insistent chime from the monitor on her wrist. She’s seven. She stood in our bedroom doorway, crying, asking what she’d done wrong. Nothing, I wanted to say. You’ve done nothing wrong. You’re perfect. But we don’t use that word anymore.

The Optimisation Hubs line every street in Salford now. Twenty-four hours, no appointment necessary. You walk in with your deficiencies, walk out marginally improved. Sleep efficiency. Attention span. Empathy metrics. All adjustable. All improvable.

My daughter went in at 6am. Came out humming, her score restored, her tears forgotten. She’s been in fourteen times this year.

I remember when children just were. Before the metrics, before the monitors. My mother let me be bored. Let me fail. Let me sit in the garden doing absolutely nothing, becoming no one in particular.

Stagnation, they’d call it now.

My own score’s been slipping. I’ve started thinking about the old days too often. Unproductive cognition. The Hub sends gentle reminders—helpful nudges, encouraging incremental correction. My daughter watches me with her bright, optimised eyes.

“Daddy,” she says. “You should go. You’d feel so much better.”

She’s right, probably. Everyone feels better, after.


But Why?

What I found even more interesting than the story was its thinking behind the story. I’d asked Claude, “Why does this story fit the quote, explain your thinking behind it.” And it did…

The quote’s usually meant as reassurance, don’t obsess over getting things perfect, just keep iterating, shipping, improving. It’s a productivity mantra. Agile development. Kaizen. All very sensible.

But there’s something sinister lurking underneath if you push it far enough. If continuous improvement is better, then perfection isn’t just delayed, it’s undesirable. An endpoint. A stopping point. And if stopping is bad, then you must never be finished. Never be enough.

So the story takes that to its conclusion: a world where perfection is a forbidden concept, where children are monitored for microscopic fluctuations in their “score” and corrected immediately. A 0.003 drop is meaningless in absolute terms, but in a system built on continuous improvement, any backsliding, however tiny, is intolerable.

The daughter’s been “optimised” fourteen times in a year. She’s seven. She’ll never be permitted to simply be a child, to exist without measurement, because that would be stagnation. The narrator remembers boredom, failure, doing nothing, all now pathologised.

And the gentleness is the worst part. No one’s forcing anyone. It’s just… expected. Encouraged. Normal. The daughter has already internalised it so completely she’s nudging her own father toward correction.

The horror isn’t the improvement. It’s the continuous. The never-ending. The quiet abolition of “enough.”

A Final Thought

I asked Claude to give me its thinking behind the story it had written, but AI chatbots can’t ‘think’ – can they?

Let me know what you think.